MyFox
 

tees's Blog

by tees from Maryland

Last Post 7 hours Ago


Children aware of voter prejudice in US

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Children are aware white males have monopolized the US presidency, and most attribute the trend to racial prejudice, according to a study published Sunday.

Calling into question the idea children live in a color- and gender-blind world, researchers at the University of Texas, Austin, reveal "most elementary-school-aged children are aware there has been no female, African-American, or Hispanic President."

In addition, "many of the children attribute the lack of representation to discrimination," said Rebecca Bigler, professor of psychology at the University of Kansas, and lead author of the study, published in the journal Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy.

The research team interviewed 205 children aged five to ten in 2006, a year before Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama began their historic bids for the White House. Clinton lost to Obama in the primary fight for the Democratic nomination. The study asked the children, from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds, about their knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about the US presidency, and specifically about similarities between presidents and the absence of female, African-American and Hispanic presidents.

A third of the children said the white male monopoly was due to "racial and gender bias," and another third believed members of the excluded groups "lacked the skills to hold the position," according to the study. One in four participants told researchers they thought it was "illegal for women and minorities to hold the office of president."

The study found children were generally optimistic about the possibility that they could be president. Girls who attributed the lack of female presidents to discrimination, however, were more likely to believe they could not become president. "The US presidency is a high profile case of racial and gender exclusion," Bigler said in a statement. "And because this topic is not typically explained to children, they appear to create their own explanations for the exclusion," she said.

The 2008 presidential election between Republican candidate John Mcain and Obama, who is black, has the potential to significantly alter children's view, said Bigler. "If Obama loses his bid for the presidency, there may be little change in children's attitudes, but it could fuel their perception that American voters are racially prejudiced," she said. "In contrast, if Obama wins children may believe that exclusionary laws and racial prejudice no longer shape the outcomes of the presidential elections."

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gf5pS0btl8W7HLoK
CsK7ZmnWr4FQ

9 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 9
Page 1 of 1
RED-DOG1 read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 11:22 AM

"many of the children attribute the lack of representation to discrimination,"

5-10 year old kids subjected to this type of questioning said that?

Sounds like another attempt at a WHITE PRIVILEGE blog.

get a life bigot!

LilBits read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:08 PM

Wow, it is very sad to think that others will not believe the old sayings, "out of the mouth of babes will the truth be told".

Tees,

It is apparent that there is some validity to this story as many people not just children attribute this lack of representation to discrimination, as it is a wonderful thing to see others outside of the normal pool in the election process as I am wondering why it has taken so long. We have not had a choice over the years to elect someone outside of the old "white men" as this is an opening for all races to get into the race, I think.

tees read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 2:20 PM

ACCORDING TO THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS, A "BIGOT" I AM NOT....BUT ACCORDING TO THESE SAME DEFINITIONS, THERE ARE A FEW BLOGGERS HERE WHO QUALIFY; AND RED-DOG WOULD BE ONE OF THEM.

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
big·ot
–noun a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.

American Heritage Dictionary
big·ot
n. One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

WordNet
noun
a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own

Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
Bigot
1. A hypocrite; esp., a superstitious hypocrite. [Obs.]
2. A person who regards his own faith and views in matters of religion as unquestionably right, and any belief or opinion opposed to or differing from them as unreasonable or wicked. In an extended sense, a person who is intolerant of opinions which conflict with his own, as in politics or morals; one obstinately and blindly devoted to his own church, party, belief, or opinion.

PEACE.

Whordawg read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 7:36 PM

Tees most children between 5 and 10 years old dont have a clue as to what is going on, except what they hear their Mon and Dad and the Teachers talk about. I really dont think this is an unbiased artical from the paper.

And your deffinition of bigot at least this one. WordNet
noun
a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own

That would pretty much cover 99% of all the people on the blogs. Me Iam not a bigot I hate everyone equally. BWAAA

Secret_Squirrel read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 10:24 PM

Seems to me the American Heritage definition confirms red-dog1's comment.

I am new here and tees all your posts seem to fit that definition to a TEE.

I posted my black privilege post only as a reotrt to your racist and bigotry filled blog.

Secret_Squirrel read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 10:28 PM

I have read a lot of red-dog1's blogs and find them actually pretty intelligent.
Thought out and actually making valid points.

I see no racism or bigotry in any of them. A couple comments about a certain race in no way constitute a bigot, but constant blogging on subject matter towards one race or another is.

Could you post an example of him being a bigot please?

Linebacker53 read my blog view my photos
Oct 6, 2008 | 11:11 PM

Tees:

It's possible that this research could have some merit & meaning to it. People are saying that children of this age group can't ascertain what's happening but, have they stopped to think that some of these kids can use a computer better than an adult? Children are curious in nature and have a tendency to notice what others think they are not....

With each generation, kids are becoming more intelligent at a younger age...

Secret_Squirrel read my blog
Oct 6, 2008 | 11:24 PM

I think children of that age aren't really concerning them selves with the past Presidents. Or the race of those Presidents at that.
Children seem to always go with suggestive questioning.
I highly doubt you can sit a 5 or 10 year old down and not directly affect his answers to the end results your looking for.
How many children out there are pondering that kind of stuff?

When I was that young I just wanted my hotwheels and a grilled cheese sandwich.
I think life is to short to begin with, let the kids be innocent as long as they can be.

caffeinated-cow read my blog
Oct 7, 2008 | 6:25 PM

I agree with the blogger who wrote that most 5-10 year olds just parrot back whatever their parents and other adults tell them. That's mostly true. I don't think many 7 year olds discuss Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations" or the complete works of William Shakespeare during recess. What they know of Adam Smith and Shakespeare is primarily what they have been told, not what they have analysed and critiqued themselves.

That's why this sentence is particularly scary:

" One in four participants told researchers they thought it was "illegal for women and minorities to hold the office of president."

This tells me that the adults in this child's life are ignorant of fundamental American history and civics. It also speaks volumes--negative volumes--- about the quality of education in the US.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




tees

I'm a new user who hasn’t written a bio yet.

Member Since: 2/21/2007