MyFox
 

tees's Blog

by tees from Maryland

Last Post 8 hours Ago


Commentary: The Deaths of Young Black Men is an Ongoing National Crisis, Yet is Met with a Giant Shrug

Date: Sunday, December 02, 2007
By: Deborah Mathis, BlackAmericaWeb.com

On day in the early 1960s, a patch of interstate highway was opened in my hometown of Little Rock, Arkansas. Reporters described the first car to touch the new pavement and quoted state officials about what the multi-lane stretch would mean for commerce and commuters’ convenience.

That day, a teenage black boy took to the interstate on his bicycle. He was struck and killed -- a horror at any time, but especially in those days when you seldom heard about young black boys dying. So shocking was the accident that people talked about it for months.

The death of black boys and young black men is so common now that the news doesn’t even bother to keep up. It takes the death of a superstar, like pro footballer Sean Taylor, to get communities talking.

If only Taylor had been the only young black man cut down by senseless violence last week. But he was just the most famous one of many.

It’s been that way for two decades now. Twenty years of self-destruction that, for the most part, the country has met with a giant shrug. What we have here is an ongoing national emergency, albeit undeclared.

“A telling thing happened in the wake of the Columbine massacre,” I wrote in my 2002 book, Yet A Stranger: Why Black Americans Still Don’t Feel at Home. “The entire country turned inward, tearing itself apart for answers, for reasons, for anything to explain how two young white boys from supposedly solid, comfortable homes and a community that prided itself on old-fashioned values and religious fealty -- two boys with whole lifetimes ahead of them -- became so possessed of anger, so diabolical, so obsessed with revenge, so obedient to evil, so racked with hatred.  We investigated the whole of modern American culture. Was it television programming, rife with gratuitous violence and sex? Could it have been the seedy, violent video games the boys favored? Is that how they learned to kill so cavalierly?

“Might alienation from, and bullying by, the school’s in-crowd have had anything to do with it? What about music, like the raging, screeching rock they preferred? Had a satanic cult consumed their innocence? Parental supervision, was it too lax? Did illegal drugs drive them to it? Was a chemical imbalance to blame? How about the availability of firearms; could that have been it? Did the absence of prayer in public schools leave a hole big enough for the devil to come in?

“A nationwide search for answers, an all-points bulletin, was launched. Law enforcement authorities, sociologists, physicians, psychologists, educators, parent groups, students, even the U.S. Congress and the White House kicked into high gear, searching for the demons that had invaded the young minds, commandeered them and directed the slaughter. There was consensus that some external force had compelled the boys to murder and, with all urgency and determination, the country set out to apprehend that mysterious provocateur. It was a state of emergency.

"But it was a tardy declaration. Since more than a decade before the Columbine tragedy, black youths have been killing one another at dizzying rates. Beginning in the mid-1980s, the homicide rate of young black men blasted off the charts. Funeral directors, who used to handle young bodies only occasionally by way of disease or accident, began keeping undersized caskets in their inventory and honing their skills at repairing holes in the chest and face and making young skin look as natural as possible. Support groups for mothers of slain youngsters sprang up around the country. Ministers got more calls for counsel in the middle of the night. Kids in impoverished neighborhoods that were susceptible to violence began writing down instructions for their own funerals -- the clothing they wanted to be buried in, the color of the coffin, the music they wanted played at the funeral service.”

“Yet no state of emergency had been called. There had been no haste to discover what on earth was bedeviling black youths. No search party had been dispatched to nab the monster, to cut off the cancer that had metastasized, spelling our demise. It was as if the country had decided violence was an inherent impulse among black youths, an internal force to reckon with, while in the Columbine case it was believed to be the work of outside influences ... ”

Our sons and brothers are not born to kill nor are they destined to be killed. External forces turn the sweet baby in the cradle into a menace in the ‘hood. Could we track them down with the same determination that we employ in writing off their prey?

http://www.blackamericaweb.com/site.aspx/sayitloud/
mathis1203

11 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 11
Page 1 of 1
grandillusion read my blog
Dec 13, 2007 | 11:13 AM

The reason that Columbine received the attention it did was because it was the first time something like that had happened... not unlike the example given of the bicycle accident on a brand new interstate.

Last weekend there were no shootings in DC... and that made the news which is a shame, however I believe this can be attributed to Kathy Lanier's All Hands on Deck.

I'd take it a step further and call out the National Guard and have them permanently placed in trouble areas... but then you run the risk of angering the local community with targeted enforcement.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:27 PM

"I'd take it a step further and call out the National Guard and have them permanently placed in trouble areas"

It's a violation of federal law to use military troops in law enforcement.It's called the Posse Comitatus Act.I'm sure the National Guard is probably a legal loophole though.

"Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

grandillusion read my blog
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:31 PM

There are a number of situations in which the Act does not apply. These include:

National Guard units while under the authority of the governor of a state;
Troops used under the order of the President of the United States pursuant to the Insurrection Act, as was the case during the 1992 Los Angeles Riots.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 831, the Attorney General may request that the Secretary of Defense provide emergency assistance if civilian law enforcement is inadequate to address certain types of threat involving the release of nuclear materials, such as potential use of a nuclear or radiological weapon. Such assistance may be by any personnel under the authority of the Department of Defense, provided such assistance does not adversely affect U.S. military preparedness.

grandillusion read my blog
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:34 PM

In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill that grants the President the right to commandeer federal or state National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision (Section 1076) that allows the President to

“...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy...”

Senator Patrick Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. 331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what conditions martial law may be declared.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:40 PM

"The reason that Columbine received the attention it did was because it was the first time something like that had happened"

Uuuuuuuhh,No!Not by a long shot.School related killings and shootings have been going on in this country and around the world for a very long time.Largest school killing in the U.S. is still the May 18th incident in Bath,Michigan where school board member Andrew Kehoe first killed his wife then detonated two bombs killing 45 people(mostly kids) and wounding 58 more.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:41 PM

Excuse me that was May 18th 1927

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:49 PM

John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision (Section 1076)

You're absolutely right.I forgot all about this sneaky move.As far as I am concerned this was the last straw for George Bush.While I still don't side with the Bush bashers due to wanting to give both credit and scorn where it's due I can honestly say that I have no more use for the man.He's a disgrace to our country and the ideologies it was founded upon.Over and over again he has proven himself to be quite the closet liberal from this(above) to promising to sign an assault weapons ban to wanting to disarm all Iraqi civilians.The sooner his term is over the better.Hell,I could handle his wife being prez more than him.That's something I couldn't say about Bill Clinton for sure.

grandillusion read my blog
Dec 13, 2007 | 12:56 PM

Maybe I should have qualified...

"The reason that Columbine received the attention it did was because it was the first time students committed mass murder in school with firearms in which the incident was caught on video tape and broadcast by the media for the world to see."

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Dec 13, 2007 | 1:13 PM

O.K. that was better.I just wanted a clarification there because to hear the media tell it it goes on a hundred times a day,if your kids go to school they WILL die,everyone's out to get YOU,etc,etc........

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Dec 13, 2007 | 1:19 PM

Now I reckon I need to clarify.What I was getting at is that the media often talks about Columbine and that style incident like it's a new thing and usually blaming it on those "new" so called "assault rifles" or some other such thing.

priveye
Dec 13, 2007 | 4:45 PM

Doesn't sound like a state of emergency to me.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




tees

I'm a new user who hasn’t written a bio yet.

Member Since: 2/21/2007