MyFox
 

ReportFromTheFront's Blog

by ReportFromTheFront from Washington, D.C.

Last Post 8 days, 20 hours Ago


          When I was a young boy, I used to be able to ride the bus for the princely sum – at that time - of fifteen cents. In those years, a Coke cost a dime, a pack of gum was a nickel and penny candy was, well, a penny. If you bought an entire100 count box of hot cinnamon Fireballs (the unquestioned reigning favorite at my elementary school which became so popular, it was smuggled in like contraband and spawned a cottage industry whereby individual pieces were upcharged and sold by our 5th grade version of the Mafia for a nickel apiece), the store we bought them from threw in an extra twenty five pieces.

            I was standing at a bus stop one day waiting for the bus to take me home when a bigger boy who lived at the end of the block breezed by on a motorcycle, stopped and offered to give me a ride home thereby saving me my fifteen cents. I don’t think I opened my eyes or even remembered to take a breath until he deposited me in my own driveway. Scared though I was, I was hooked. As soon as I was able to drive, I asked my parents for a motorcycle. The answer, of course, was a resounding no. After marrying the first Mrs. ReportFromTheFront, I informed her that I wanted to ride. ‘Over my dead body’, she said; a thought which, shortly thereafter, began to have its own singular appeal.

            After jettisoning the first Mrs. RPTF, I eventually got a bike, taught myself to ride and joined the Montgomery County chapter of ABATE. I started to go to the weekly meetings and discovered to my surprise that the only substantive issue on their agenda – road trips aside - was a concerted endorsement of legislation for the repeal of the local helmet laws (In Maryland, all riders must wear a helmet Not so in Pennsylvania, Ohio and a smattering of other states). I couldn’t believe how vehement they were about it. Some of the members almost frothed at the mouth whenever the subject came up – which was usually the case every week. They even employed lobbyists and aimed them at the State House in Annapolis. These guys can’t be serious, I thought. Foolishly, I made the mistake of openly disagreeing with them at a meeting one evening. After all, I reasoned, in the event you go down, anything to protect you has got to be a good thing. Oh, not so, was the angry response. To prove their point, my (now) opponents on the matter produced mountains of data, expert analysis and numbers you wouldn’t believe to support their position showing, in fact, that helmets were nothing more than window dressing. Not only were they useless in a crash, helmets, they said, actually caused more injuries than they prevented.

            I ultimately left the group over this issue and their seemingly single-minded pursuit. Sure, they had all of the aforementioned stuff to back up their position, but to me, it only proved the old axiom that no matter the issue or how crazy your position, you can always dig up numbers to support you. Say what you want, anything to cushion the impact between a rider and an onrushing immovable object to my way of thinking has just got to be, as I said, a good thing.

            It’s just common sense.

            And so it is with detractors and nay-sayers with respect to the subject of global warming.  Through the ages, the earth has gone through several cooling and warming trends, the pendulum taking multiple eons to swing either way. What is happening now however, the recent phenomenon we call Global Warming, is something completely different and not the net result of the waxing and waning of Mother Nature. What is happening now is artificially driven by mankind and the waste products pumped into the atmosphere and waterways since the onset of the Industrial Revolution, and visibly occurring over the course of mere generations. In the most simple and basic of terms (and with apologies to comedian George Carlin), think of it as looking at a confessional line and actually being able to see it move.

            Ice shelves at both poles are receding at an alarming rate sometimes resulting in the ‘calving’ of icebergs as big as some states. So much ice is disappearing so quickly – resulting in a sharply diminished range for polar bears and snow foxes – that the existence of both species is in doubt. Ocean temperatures are rising ever so slightly (Imagine for a moment if you will, the enormous amount of therms required to change the temperature of so large a mass). This not only affects the long term longevity of a broad variety of plants and animals – both ocean and land based - but our weather is being affected as well with hotter and more oppressive summers followed by longer, colder and more brutal winters in many parts of the world. The occurrence of severe weather such as tornadoes and hurricanes are on the rise. Droughts are happening more often and affecting ever widening areas. The symptoms I’ve listed here are just the tip of the iceberg, to coin a phrase. More things are happening – or at least being detected – every day and are just too numerous to list here, but I think you get the idea.

            Despite all of the empirical evidence, no less a personage than the President of the United States and hard core Republican members of Congress have – at least until recently – mythologized global warming and reduced it to the status of a political football. It wasn’t until the President became concerned about his legacy, that he became a recent convert and begrudgingly acknowledged the possibility that his perhapsprevious position on global warming may have been a bit too hasty.

            Remember too, that this is the very same President who has steadfastly refused to call our treatment of enemy combatants captured in Iraq and Afghanistan as torture and will not - under any circumstances  - acknowledge that the United States is now in a recession.

            While it may be a pie-in-the-sky view to believe that all candidates running for elected office at any level only do so because they want to serve and truly have the best interests of the electorate at heart. In the real world however, it must be acknowledged that it is a basic characteristic of politics to blow with the wind a bit, to tell a particular audience that which they want to hear and to pander for votes. It is the nature of the beast and, unfortunately, unavoidable. If candidates – and ultimately office holders – would only take a firm stance on issues, speak their minds and vote their convictions, we wouldn’t have the political turmoil we experience every four years and the world we live in would be a better place.

 

            After all, it’s only common sense.

11 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 11
Page 1 of 1
bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 27, 2008 | 11:10 PM

The Politicians simply reflect we the people. I find that who gets elected does represent usA. Unfortunately.

Y3Y3 read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 12:55 PM

Sorry report....WRONG AGAIN.

The computer models being used as the 'proof' of GW don't even work. They loaded all the relevant data for 150 years into their simulation, and they were UNABLE to get the predictions to match even 2-3 weeks after the end of the data. They don't care that the REAL SUN has variable output, n steady state. These same 'scientists' can't explain what effect the CLOUDS have on our weather, or climate.

The politicians aren't science types, and tehy are trusting poorly educated political staff members to tell them what to do. It's a shame they are getting unprovable BS instead of the FACTS.

Their ignorance will cost all of us a LOT!

bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 1:12 PM

Y3Y3, we the people's ignorance will cost us a lot. It's not the politicians job to educate us. We can educate ourselves. For example, there are many of us college grads that now realize we were told lies about the Bible and the Qur'an all of our lives. If that doesn't prove it, nothing else will. Just two books, everyone can read translated into English and other languages and we don't even care about that. We don't monitor our teachers with such simple minded documents cheaply available to everyone on the Planet.

Y3Y3 read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 3:43 PM

Religious opinions are NOT being discussed here Boots. Global Warming is.

The original poster cut n pasted that from some eco-nutcase site. No research, but verbage that sounds like they know science. The Ice caps observations are all wrong. The ACTUAL people who DO measure polar ice caps say thee is no loss of ice! The polar bear experts say the stories relating their 'plight' as the ice caps melt is all BS. No ice melts other than seasonal ones, and no problems with the polar bears.

The GW issue would GO AWAY TODAY if you KNEW that they don't want ANY data from the SUN to be involved. No data has been collected as to solar output, no integration of sun heat data into global warming ASSUMPTIONS. If you knew the Warming is cyclic, and due to the suns heat output - NOTHING WE DID HERE ON EARTH - the guilt would be gone! WE ON EARTH DID NOT screw up the earth.

bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 6:05 PM

I didn't discuss religion. I discussed scientific treatment of two books. They are not religious books. They are historical artifacts. If people can't read them correctly how can we ever get people to understand global warming one way or another. Until people get it through their heads that the Bible and the Qur'an are just archeological artifacts, and treat them that way, how do you expect any decent discussion about anything. Besides all this, if they don't carry around the Periodic Table of Elements in their cell phones, well, it all works together. No one knows what they are talking about any more. Movies can be doctored. A plus or minus sign can change a whole scientific fact. If people don't read the Bible and the Qur'an together and get that out of the way, then religion can update itself and encourage the discussion of Global Warming in Church and show how Israel used to be a land of Milk and Honey and had plenty of trees on them there hills:) How there were more rivers that contributed to the Euphrates and Tigris. Creation Science vs Evolution. All of this can be turned around by religion. Instead they are not using the brains of people properly and the people let them get away with it. The Church could definitely help in gathering information on the Sun, perfect. Since you brought up religion, not me.

Why do you consistently associate the Bible and the Qur'an with religion? I just don't get it. I think you have religion on the brain so I just answered in terms of the positive use of religion to satisfy you.

The Bible and the Qur'an are a

bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 6:11 PM

(cont.) filter for me to determine if people even read.

So you think some Sun God is responsible for increased CO2 and we're experiencing the end of the world as supposedly the Mayans predicted for 2012. On the streets, they talk this way for real. People who otherwise seem to think the way I do about general things. Revelation is in today. Live drink and be merry, 'cause tomorrow we die?

Y3Y3 read my blog view my photos
May 29, 2008 | 9:14 PM

The sun. Pure and simple. On the technical side, the lowest wave heat radiation coming off the sun is at a slightly lower frequency and more heat is absorbed. The same rate of increase has been observed on Mars and Venus. The cycle has been a little higher lately and a little less heat is absorbed.


We would be better served if we put up a system to deflect asteroids and space debris. A smallish asteroid could still eliminate all life on earth in a few hours. A middle sized chunk of rock just glances off, but at a high rate of speed would spell the very end. People say they 'understand' science. Why is it so few people USE that knowledge everyday?

Possibility of getting hit -moderate.(we GET hit about every 50,000 years.
possibility of dying due to global warming (.8 degree a century)

bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 3:34 AM

Okay, I do know that at the time we first started going to Mars, NASA didn't know that much about even clouds. We don't have a good "cloud" database because we didn't care "to know clouds at all" until now. So you are talking about Global Warming and the fact that as a subject, the information is incomplete. However, what about the CO2 build-up?

The answer to your question about "why so few people" is a very good way to discuss the whole subject of Global Warming. It's like asking why didn't people observe in the first oil cartel that their cars did use more gasoline when they didn't obey the speed limits. I saw it happen on my own fuel guage as I drove. The car industry didn't cause our present fuel problem, they tried to help.

Why do people prefer WMD's instead of WMI's? Weapons of Mass Instruction.

One way to instruct people is via CO2. That hits the nose directly. Clouds of CO2. We are spending all our money in the Middle East, no matter what they say. Mostly on WMD's. Instead, the InterLinear Qur'an: Arabic2 Hebrew would get rid of the trashy thinking and the individual would naturally be less stressed and then find out all about clouds. The water in heaven in the Hebrew Pentateuch. The Ph.D's in Theology know all this but they are paid by "we, the people".

bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 5:05 AM

Okay, I do know that at the time we first started going to Mars, NASA didn't know that much about even clouds. We don't have a good "cloud" database because we didn't care "to know clouds at all" until now. So you are talking about Global Warming and the fact that as a subject, the information is incomplete. However, what about the CO2 build-up?

The answer to your question about "why so few people" is a very good way to discuss the whole subject of Global Warming. It's like asking why didn't people observe in the first oil cartel that their cars did use more gasoline when they didn't obey the speed limits. I saw it happen on my own fuel guage as I drove. The car industry didn't cause our present fuel problem, they tried to help.

Why do people prefer WMD's instead of WMI's? Weapons of Mass Instruction.

One way to instruct people is via CO2. That hits the nose directly. Clouds of CO2. We are spending all our money in the Middle East, no matter what they say. Mostly on WMD's. Instead, the InterLinear Qur'an: Arabic2 Hebrew would get rid of the trashy thinking and the individual would naturally be less stressed and then find out all about clouds. The water in heaven in the Hebrew Pentateuch. The Ph.D's in Theology know all this but they are paid by "we, the people".

Y3Y3 read my blog view my photos
May 30, 2008 | 1:11 PM

CO2 build up?? This sharts showing up between 750 and 1100 years AFTER A TEMPERATURE SPIKE. CO2 FOLLOWS the rises in Temperature, NOT causes it.


Bootsy, DON'T PARSE. You miss the points by taking statements out of context.

AveMaria22 read my blog
Jun 1, 2008 | 4:44 PM

Hey, Reports...I love this blog...it is a joy to read. I had a friend years ago who was anti-helmet law..but complied. Then one day he dropped his bike and hit a brick wall. The helmet saved his life..it was caved on one side and almost shattered. He walked away with nothing but a slight headache. He became an instant believer in the helmet law. He took it a step forward and said wearing leathers should be included in that law..his prevented the shredding of his body and limbs. As far a global warming is concerned, if I were offered a choice in who to believe, I would choose scientists. We all have to agree that what our scientists KNOW is highly subjective; however, it does not take a genius to recognize that something is very wrong with our planet...our primary concern in my opinion is learning to protect our water supply to keep it safe and uncontaminated...before it is too late. Global warming may be cyclic in nature...I don't think we can be certain because we've not been recording it for a billion years.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




ReportFromTheFront

I am a MyFoxLocal user who hasn't yet written a bio.

Member Since: 1/18/2007