MyFox
 

Mountaineerfan's Blog

by Mountaineerfan from Western Va. mountain

Last Post 2 days, 12 hours Ago


If anyone needs any more evidence as to the real purpose behind NY Mayor Bloomberg's war on gun owners and dealers is about then here it is.I'll give you a hint,it's NOT about fighting crime.

Isn't it ironic that a man who openly admits to wanting gun laws changed while at the same time not knowing anything at all about the current laws suddenly wants all reference to the defendant's rights under The Constitution banned from a trial that he's a part of?

ReportFromTheFront,is this the government you say we don't need to protect ourselves from?


    BELLEVUE, Wash., May 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- New York Mayor
Michael Bloomberg has moved from outrage to atrocity, said the Second
Amendment Foundation, by asking anti-gun activist federal Judge Jack B.
Weinstein to ban any reference to the Second Amendment during a civil
lawsuit trial beginning May 27 against Georgia gun dealer Jay Wallace,
proprietor at Adventure Outdoors.
 The New York Sun reported that Bloomberg's attorneys made the request.
Alan Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, said the move
clearly shows that Bloomberg has "total disregard not only for the Second
Amendment, but also the First."
Bloomberg's attorney on this case, Eric Proshansky, has reportedly
argued in a brief that "Any references to the Second Amendment or analogous
state constitutional provisions are likewise irrelevant" to the upcoming
trial.
"This trial is supposed to be held in a federal court, not a kangaroo
court," Gottlieb stated. "What's next, a request that Judge Weinstein not
allow defense witnesses or rebuttal? Why not just dispense with the trial
altogether and lynch Mr. Wallace from the limb of a tree out in Central
Park?
"The civil prosecution, and un-civil persecution, of Jay Wallace has
never really been about the Second Amendment, until right now," he
observed. "And, thanks to Mr. Proshansky's brief, this trial is suddenly
all about the First Amendment as well.
"We are neither surprised nor shocked at Mayor Bloomberg and the city's
attorney for making this move," Gottlieb added. "This is the kind of
behavior one should expect from a billionaire demagogue who considers
himself so far above the law that he launched this vigilante campaign
against firearms retailers by stepping outside legal channels in the first
place. He sent private agents to several states without legal authority,
jeopardizing legitimate on-going criminal investigations in the process.
"Now Bloomberg wants a gag order," he concluded. "Apparently, in
Mikey's world, a fair trial is one in which a defense attorney is muzzled,
and the defendant is already guilty until proven innocent. Bloomberg missed
his calling. Instead of being mayor of an American city, he should have
been the administrator of a gulag."



    The Second Amendment Foundation
(http://www.saf.org) is the nation's oldest
and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action
group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own
and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more
than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to
better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

13 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 13
Page 1 of 1
Starrman1 read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 10:30 AM

Bloomberg is another misguided pile of flop that just does not have a clue, and does not care an iota about the Bill of Rights.

Starrman1 read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 10:30 AM

BTW, I will bet HE has well armed body guards and security 24/7.

Y3Y3 read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 11:17 AM

New York must have something BAD in the water. Why are so many NY/NYC politicians corrupt immoral ignorant liars? Who's electing them to office?

Oh, Liberals.

BigSmooov read my blog
May 12, 2008 | 1:44 PM

"...corrupt immoral ignorant liars?" I didn't know this bolg was about Rove, Cheney, and Bush.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 2:53 PM

"I will bet HE has well armed body guards and security 24/7"

Oh,you know it Starrman.It's what I call the Rosie O'donell syndrom,or any other Hollywood star who touts their pet gun control initiatives yet are surrounded by bodyguards.I pick Rosie in particular because she once said something about anyone who felt unsafe should just hire a bodyguard instead.It seems like Oprah once said something to that effect too.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 3:06 PM

BTW,Starrman,if you're wondering who the biggest anti-gun hypocrit in Hollywood is that would be Sylvester Stallone.
Sylvester not only gives large chunks of money to and raises money for The Brady Center but,at the same time,possesses a concealed carry permit for a handgun.
Allof this from someone who,on one hand,has made untold millions using guns to blow people away in his movies,yet has advocated door to door confiscations of all guns from everyone.Everyone but him apparently.

Check it out here:

http://blog.riflegear.com/articles/the-hypocrisy-of-syl
vester-stallone.aspx

An interesting read if nothing else.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 3:12 PM

Y3 you asked "Who's electing them to office?" then you said "Oh, Liberals."

Yeah that's true and all but I blame much of it on the NY Times.I wouldn't even begin to know where to start with how much bull plop comes from them,especially when it comes to guns.They are rabid antis.

If the NY Times ever allowed comments about it's articles online their circulation would plumet in a week.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 3:16 PM

Smooov said "I didn't know this bolg was about Rove, Cheney, and Bush"

It's not but since you brought it up when are you gonna get around to commenting on all of those lies told by Democrats regarding WMD and our need to go to war over them?You know,the same political hacks who keep saying "Bush lied" and "Bush went to war for oil".

I'll be waiting.

bootsykowan read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 4:37 PM

Well, maybe, just maybe it will go up to the USA Supreme Court?

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
May 12, 2008 | 8:03 PM

No Boots what will happen is that once again Bloomberg will use his billionaire money to waste someome little guy's money until it goes to the appeals court.It will then be overturned and insane judge Weinstein will be handed his a z z then his hat......again!

AveMaria22 read my blog
May 13, 2008 | 5:26 PM

Hmmm. What are the New York City and New York State gun laws? Is it legal to own guns in NYC?

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
May 13, 2008 | 10:49 PM

AveMaria that is like asking what flavors does ice cream come in.The answer is long and varies with the local'.Here is a good place to start though:

http://www.nraila.org/statelawpdfs/NYSL.pdf

Here's another good source:

http://www.ocshooters.com/Gen/nyslegal.htm

ReportFromTheFront read my blog
May 15, 2008 | 9:06 PM

Personally, I'd like to read the filings and motions so I'd know what the case is about. It's tough to tell from the posting.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Mountaineerfan

Just someone from the sticks.

Member Since: 9/16/2006