MyFox
 

Malechavinist's Blog

by Malechavinist from MD/VA

Last Post 353 days, 18 hours Ago


I am just done with every goverment agency , ad company, street preacher, and entity that comes on every media source and claims disaster around every corner!

Lets start with cars... now they want carmakers to reduce emissions even more by 2011

All this bulls... amendment is , is a reason carmakers willraise the price of a vehicle and get more tax revnue from your pocket. It is not being made for your health.

Also they want it mandatory for cars to have anti-rollover devices standard on cars by 2012.

You want to stop rollovers? Learn to stinkin drive!!!!!

All of these idiot drivers causing carmakers to supposely make cars safer to drive cannot

install " anti idiot driver alarms" on cars!

Look at some of the things carmakers had to install because of these idiot drivers

  1. Seat  belts were not enough to save these idiots so airbags and now air curtains are being installed to keep these people alive and back on the road again
  2. Daytime driving lights because some idiot swears they didn't see you in the middle of the afternoon
  3. A sensor to tell when it is dark and turn on thier headlights, because they are too stupid to look out the window and turn them on themselves
  4. Traction control because idiots don't know to slow down and/or gear down in bad weather or conditions
  5. Antilock brakes obviously because they know how to go ,but, don't know how to stop
  6. rain sensing wipers because they are too stupid too see it raining and turnon te wipers themselves
  7. They installed direction giving devices because thet are too stupid to read a map and figure it out before they leave home
  8. They added a extra taillight becuase these idiot drivers couldn't see the first 2

The only thing that are installed on cars that they don't use is the turn signal switch because they forget to turn it off 5 miles down the road

You always hear the stories about how the seat belt saved someones life.... How many people died with the seat belt on? Never hear that side do you? How many people didn't die without wearing a seat belt? they don't tell you that either.

The old saying is 40% of accidents involved drivers that were drinking.

Then 60% were cause by other idiots and you cannot make being stupid illegal.

You want to know the real reason drunk driving is up?

Because they keep lowering the BAC.  Why ? Becasue they know you are not impaired after one or two drinks and the records were showing that they were wrong about drinking and driving and they keep lowering the BAC to back thier claims.

Example: Aguy leaves the bar after a few drinks, after stopping at a red light a sober idiot rear ends him and he isc harged with the accident!

Anything to inflate thier statistics about drinking and driving.

Have you ever wonderd why a off duty police officer has never been charged with DUI/DWI or driving while impaired?

Maybe all police officers are non-drinkers

I will save my next rant for another blog later

 

 

10 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 10
Page 1 of 1
ex-mpd read my blog view my photos
Apr 6, 2007 | 9:26 AM

You wrote..."Have you ever wondered whay a off duty police officer has never been charged with DUI/DWI or driving while impaired?"
Where in the world are you getting your statistics? I know of three personally. It is easy to deduce by your blog, that you have either been involved in a recent motor vehicle collision, or many motor vehicle collisions. Or you have been convicted of quite a few DUI/DWI's, and just got another one.

caffeinated-cow read my blog
Apr 6, 2007 | 9:36 AM

I can't remember the exact term but there is terminology to describe that people will take larger risks when they feel safer. They did a study where parents were asked if they were more likely to allow their children to do certain skate board tricks (like skating down a stair rail) with a helmet and padding or without the helmet and padding. The study showed the parents were more likely to allow their children to perform 'risky' skateboard trick if the children were wearing helmet and body padding because they thought the safety equipment would keep their children from harm.

So I think it's human nature that if the more secure we feel the more likely we are to engage in risky behavior.

Why be mindful about your driving with you have seat belts and air bags to protect you?

moses737 read my blog
Apr 6, 2007 | 10:03 AM

All these things are being done to make you poorer and to get you ready to be a new world order regulated slave to the globalist government that will be telling you what to do from the time you wake up in the morning to the time that you lie down to sleep!! WELCOME TO YOUR FUTURE NEW WORLD ORDER SLAVE WORLD. AND ITS COMING VERY SOON!!

JFLM read my blog view my photos
Apr 6, 2007 | 12:46 PM

I understand your frustration but can't agree with most of your logic.

Do you really think that the only reason car makers raise prices is to conform to new emission and safety standards? They are going to raise the prices anyway.

It is a fact that gasoline is a non-renewable energy source. Doesn't it make sense to improve gas mileage and reduce emmisions? Do you think car makers would make these changes by themselves? No way.

Why should we use the same technology engines from 30 years ago?

Seat belts DO prevent injuries as do car seats for babies and toddlers. Unfortunately some people are not informed enough to realize this, so the gov't has to mandate it.

And don't forget the latest thing that many car makers are now adding - rear view cameras.
Why? because there have been many cases where children have been run over (you can't see directly behind the car).

There are a lot of technological changes that have been made not necesarily because we are all idiots, but because we want to make our lives better and safer. Think of toilet paper as one of those great inventions.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Apr 6, 2007 | 2:04 PM

Y'all the whole thing is really a very simple scam.First these insurance company groups lobby lawmakers to make insurance mandatory.They then lobby lawmakers to mandate safer vehicles.
Therefore vehicles get safer,injury drops yet insurance premiums continue to go up.Who's really making the money?
Funny that I don't see any police style defensive driving courses being made mandatory.Well,actually,I did see one a few years ago.California I think.It was a huge success.I'm sure it was just a fluke though.I mean just imagine actually teaching a kid to handle a vehicle skillfully as apposed to just teaching them basic traffic regs and then hooking their unskilled little egos to speeding heavy metal.

Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Apr 6, 2007 | 2:12 PM

Also,JFLM,I gotta disagree with you.I have kpt up with the auto industry for most of my life and I assure you that they DO want to make their cars better.Gas milage,safety,emmisions,performance,etc,......
These are areas in which no manufacturer preferese to remain stagnent.Stagnation has never been a suite of car makers.This isn't Outer Bulgaria and cars aren't comfort food.The public will demand changes and auto engineers love making them.However,they prefer to do it on their own.Refering to government eggheads or enviroidiots like CARB to dictate auto technology is like refering to HSUS or PETA for advice on animal welfare.Bad idea!

JFLM read my blog view my photos
Apr 6, 2007 | 2:50 PM

Yes and no. Car makers will make cars that SELL - which may not be the same as cars that are good for the environment. If we had no reg's we'd all be driving 12 cylinder mammoths.

I agree about the police style driving - that should be mandatory for every one.
When you get a pilot's license you are constantly drilled on how to handle emergency situations. Not so in a car - the only thing you can do is hope your reflex and instinct is correct because you have no training and no idea what to do.

moses737 read my blog
Apr 6, 2007 | 3:51 PM

Welcome to the POLICE STATE!! WHERE THE GLOBALIST WILL HAVE YOU GUYS ALL ENSLAVED BY HOMELAND SECURITY!! As the police/jack legged booted guards; bring you under total martial law enslavement!!

Malechavinist read my blog
Apr 6, 2007 | 4:50 PM

Maybe that is why you are so angry X
Your deductions are so far off base it is patheic!!!!!!
I have no tickets and/or DUIs or DWIs in fact I have never caused a accident though I have been run into from behind twice
Have a nice life X

Starrman read my blog view my photos
Apr 7, 2007 | 12:42 PM

ex-mpd, I think he has clearesd up his logic near the end of the 3rd sentence of his post above this one.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Malechavinist

OLD SCHOOL RAISED ON MORALS AND VALUES AND CLING TO THEM WITH A DEATH GRIP

Member Since: 2/17/2007