MyFox
 

BigSmooov's Blog

by BigSmooov from NE Washington DC

Last Post 2 days, 4 hours Ago


Black wants to risk your life for McCain?
Jun 24, 2008 | 1:02 PM
Category: News
Report This Post

The comments that Charles R. Black Jr. made further supports our theory that the republiCANTS want to play the fear card to boaster their chances at the White House! 

The senior advisor for the John McSAME camp said "A terror attack on the United States would be a big advantage for Sen. John McCain in the presidential campaign."

WHAT!?!?!?!?!?

A stratagy to show that McSAME has a stronger knowledge of international policies is to have another terrorist attack on the US? 

Bill Burton (a spockesman from Obama's campaign) is looking foward to a debate about terrorism with McSAME and called the words of Mr Black "a complete disgrace."  Burton noted that McSAME has "fully supported the Bush policies that have taken our eye off of al Qaeda, failed to bring Osama bin Laden to justice and made us less safe."

Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del) is the chairman of of the Foreign Relations Committee.  He said "For the McCain campaign to say it would benefit politically from another 9/11 attack is disgraceful.  That Mr. Black would even think in those terms, let alone express the thought publicly, is very sad.     .......The politics of fear have no place in our national life." 

Is this what it has come down to in order to win the White House?  The killing of Americans just to move up on the polls?  Well...Bush is still in office and over 4,000 of our service men and women died over a war that  Bush pushed onto the Americans because of fear.

No Sen. McSAME.....I don't need any more of the same Bush BS!  Obama '08!!!!!

Was Mr. Black's comments taken out of context?  Is this a preview of what's to come if McSAME is elected?  Politics ran by fear?

51 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 51
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
 Last
Y3Y3 read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 2:44 PM

And 0bama isn't going to have the same sissy foreign affairs folks that Clinton did? YES??? Where is the change.

0bama has The Kennedy kid helping to find him a VP? How is this any different than the BS the Demos have used before?

What NEW policies does DEMOCRAT 0bama want? How is 0bama going to alter the policies and still stand for what the Democrats SAY HE DOES? By the time the fall rolls around, 0bama will look just like what the lefty democrats WANT HIM TO!
BigSmooov read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 3:54 PM

Y3Y3....so are you just ignoring what Mr Black said? Are you excusing his comments?
tees read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 4:09 PM

I don't know if this is true or not but I have heard it said that McCain admitted that he's not used a computer... how the f-k is he suppose to run a country and he's not even computer literate...
tees read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 4:11 PM

umm...would that be similar to...say... a president who doesn't read the newspaper?

-------->
newsbuggy read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 4:50 PM

Hi Tees, welcome back!
foxfan333 read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 5:23 PM

And we cannot forget the fake fear that Colin Powell placed in our heads after supposedly finding weapons of mass destruction. Then he admitted to being fradulant. no? The war machine makes lots of money for the fat cats, and fear is what drives it. Our anger is now the result, not fear. Wow. didnt know 4000 have died so far.
priveye
Jun 24, 2008 | 5:40 PM

Welcome back Tees...how are things at the BLACK ONLY fox web site myvoiceddc.com?
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 6:26 PM

I hate to burst everyone's bubble but it was the Democrats who started that whole "Sadam has WMD's and we need to destroy him now whatever it takes" thing.
foxfan333 read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 6:55 PM

Mountaineerfan, I disagree. Then why did Bush allow Powell to give a huge symposium? The fact is the wohle thing is wrong. It irritates me that we have so many needs to be addressed in our own USA. We need to take care of our own better.
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:29 PM

You disagree do ya?

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.
We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:30 PM

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:31 PM

"Hussein has .. chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:31 PM

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002


"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998.
We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:32 PM

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep.
Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:33 PM

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
Mountaineerfan read my blog view my photos
Jun 24, 2008 | 8:35 PM

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003


I find it awefully peculiar that the same people making these quotes are now the same ones championing the lie of "Bush lied and went to war for oil".Strange,huh?
foxfan333 read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 10:25 PM

Then where are the weapons of mass destruction that have been stated?
foxfan333 read my blog
Jun 24, 2008 | 10:32 PM

So is everybody lying to get oil/money?
RED-DOG1 read my blog view my photos
Jun 25, 2008 | 6:23 AM

Fox got shut up so he changes the subject.

Must be a Obama supporter, what with CHANGING the subject now and NOW responding to the facts.

By your first question Where are the WMD? Go ask Bill.

Second, We aren't taking any oil out of Iraq.

Get your facts straight before you look like a dumbazz....to late.
RED-DOG1 read my blog view my photos
Jun 25, 2008 | 6:24 AM

Correction:
NOT responding.

too early for me right now.
Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
 Last


Write your comment below:




BigSmooov

I mostly deal with issues of inequality. Whether it be race, sex, economical, political, etc... You'll see my blogs!

Member Since: 1/16/2007


 

RSS: XMLWhat is RSS?